Sunday, May 13, 2007

Error Message

If you came here having seen my blog's error message then you'll understand my frustration at managing my own hosting.

Suffice it's in hand!

Labels:

 

 

Monday, May 07, 2007

Blog Recovery

For reasons I am still slightly scratching my head about my old WordPress blog has come back to life. Dataflame should still be congratulated on their assistance even over a bank-holiday weekend.

Anyway, the blog's back and it's redesigned at the old address:

www.gavpolitics.co.uk/blog/



 

Labels:

 

 

Saturday, May 05, 2007

Kiva.org

I am slightly reticent to publicise this at the moment given that the BBC just has. But Kiva allows people to lend money to a specific cause in the developing world.

You can choose your cause from a list and, when the money is repaid by the donee, it can be redirected towards other good causes. Unlike charitable giving there are no expenses taken by Kiva and you can choose causes that you believe will help the country in question to progress.



 

Labels: ,

 

 

Tories and the SNP

I know it won't happen, but it should.

The LibDems are being described as 'KingMakers' but if the Conservatives in Scotland really believe in democracy, they can ensure the SNP's power is not watered down by going into coalition with them. A minority coalition of Labour and the LibDems is the last thing Scotland needs and exactly what they did not ask for.

The Conservatives could ensure that Scotland gets to express its opinion in Independence and also show the Scottish electorate whether the SNP is able to run the country as they claim.
PartySeats
SNP47
LAB46
CON17
LD16
Others3
Source of table

The announcement by Cameron that the Conservative Party in Scotland is going to be outsourced should enable this freedom. A unionist party is, today, as relevant as would be the Communist Party. Parties should stand on principle — I've said it many times since Cameron started abandoning it — but when something becomes irrelevant there's no sense in hanging onto it. If we were to leave the EU (one can dream) then pro-EU parties would share a similar relevance to the "and Unionist" part of the Conservative Party's name has today.

Let's see the SNP and Conservatives work in coalition in Scotland. Let's see bravery in our parties.

 

Labels: , , , , , ,

 

 

Friday, May 04, 2007

First Thursday-itis

For the third year running I have been ill on the first Thursday of May...

I wonder if it's a coincidence or something to do with the elections!

Anyway, well done to all those Conservatives who have successfully defended their seat, or won a new one. Brighton & Hove Council's results are particularly heartening with the makeup changed from this:

Labour - 23 seats
Conservative - 19 seats
Green - 6 seats
Liberal Democrat - 3 seats
Independent - 2 seats

to this:

Conservatives - 26 seats
Labour - 13 seats
Greens - 12 seats
Liberal Democrats - 2 seats
Independent - one seat

And this despite the political nimby-isation of the planning process in Brighton & Hove particularly over the King Alfred.

 

Labels: , ,

 

 

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

The BNP as protest

Is it any wonder that the BBC's Have Your Say implies the BNP will make gains tomorrow? In a country where political opinion (if not considered appropriate by the state) is illegal (evidence here and here), what chance of an honest, racist manifesto from the BNP?

People everywhere say "The BNP aren't racist — check their manifesto". But their manifesto could not be published if it were racist, so that's no argument surely.

I agree with those who say they will vote BNP, that the movement of Blair and Cameron to the middle ground has left an ideological hole on the political extremes (more commonly referred to as the location of the silent majority). But that doesn't mean that a vote for extremists is any less dangerous.

The BNP should be feared and if you must protest abstain or vote UKIP. Of course, if you realise what the local elections are about, a vote for the Conservatives is the right option (see my last post).

 

Labels: , , , , , ,

 

 

NH yeS - relevant?

I watched a recording of the Conservative's Monday-night Party Election Broadcast last night and I must say I was confused.

The elections tomorrow are for local Councils: Borough, District or Unitary. They are for all sorts of services (depending upon the type of Council) from libraries, local roads and schools (Unitary) to Council housing, leisure centres and refuse/recycling collection (Borough and District). There's plenty to talk about, and plenty to be proud of for Conservative Councils.

So why was Cameron talking about the NHS? The NHS is the one public service thing that local government has little control over. Yes, it's important to show that the Conservatives are the ones who are more likely to reform the NHS (they always have been, despite the neglect of the 1980s), but that's not the fight these elections represent.

If you are voting tomorrow, then know this: Your vote will decide whether you pay for Council waste through your Council taxes or whether your Council works tirelessly to stop central government's policies from costing Council Tax payers too much.

You should vote Conservative tomorrow, not because we're saying warm things about the NHS, but because we almost always run Councils better than the LibDems or Labour.

 

Labels: , , ,